How to make a submission to the Government’s new car pollution standards

[ad_1]

The Authorities has simply proposed New Automobile Emissions Requirements to restrict air pollution from newly bought vehicles. It is a massive win for the local weather, as a result of transport is the third largest supply of carbon air pollution in Australia, and most of it comes from the soiled exhausts of diesel and petrol vehicles. If we don’t act, transport will change into the worst polluter by 2030.

Greenpeace has been combating for these air pollution limits on vehicles for years, and we’re virtually there. However the proposal shouldn’t be legislation but – the Authorities must finalise the design of the requirements and take them to Parliament. They’re asking in your suggestions till 4 March – we want everybody to make a submission calling for robust requirements.

Making a submission is fast and straightforward. Here’s a response information for the shape, with some factors you would possibly wish to increase with the Authorities to make their proposal higher. The solutions under are a serving suggestion solely – be happy to prepare dinner up a response as you see match!

Step 1: Observe this hyperlink for an particular person or an organisation
Step 2: Fill out the questions together with your title and electronic mail

Query Response Information

Query 3: Please rank the proposed choices so as of desire

Reply:

Query 4: Briefly, what are your causes in your selection? (non-obligatory, 3000 character restrict)

Copy and paste into the open textual content field:

The local weather disaster ought to decide goal power

The NVES ought to set emission targets over a timeframe that displays the urgency of the local weather disaster. This requires a transition to all new automotive gross sales being zero emission automobiles (ZEVs) by 2035 on the newest. Possibility C and B are each acceptable as they might make that objective achievable, however possibility C is preferable because it ramps up quicker, and has stronger targets.

Shifting quicker will lead to decrease emissions and gasoline financial savings for Australia over an extended interval, compounding the advantages of the coverage. The impression evaluation estimates that by 2050, possibility C will scale back CO2 emissions by an extra 74 million tonnes, which is able to assist the Authorities meet its local weather targets in a context the place different sectors face even higher challenges to cut back emissions.Targets are sufficiently distant for provide to catch up Possibility C and B have the identical beginning goal in 2025, which provides automotive corporations two years to arrange for the stricter targets beneath possibility C (which solely kick in from 2026 onwards). Two years is enough time for automotive makers to regulate their provide, given the variety of ZEVs already on the worldwide market and extra beneath growth. Automotive corporations have recognized of the Authorities’s intention to introduce some type of NVES since 2022, and 85% of the world is already lined by emissions requirements, making this modification foreseeable.

If there’s a quick interval the place numerous probably the most polluting automobiles in Australia improve in worth attributable to penalties beneath Possibility C, that may be managed by automotive corporations shopping for credit from 100% ZEV automotive makers, additional subsidising their worth, and inspiring the general shift.SUVs ought to be thought of passenger automobilesPossibility C and B rightly embody SUVs within the passenger car class. There isn’t a justification for the next CO2 restrict for a car that’s bigger attributable to shopper desire, quite than for a real utility or industrial motive (which is roofed by the LCV class).

The NVES ought to encourage lighter automobiles

The Authorities ought to take into account decreasing the break level for automobiles to 1800 kg or much less, or higher but, eliminating the burden based mostly adjustment altogether, to encourage the acquisition of smaller, lighter automobiles.

Penalties ought to be substantial

The EU has a penalty of $197 per g/km (AUD equal) for exceeding their CO2/km goal – to get near that, the penalty proposed beneath possibility C ought to be adopted in Australia.

Loopholes ought to be dominated outRuling out supercredits and loopholes are a wonderful function of each B and C. Banking and buying and selling of credit is suitable if restricted in scope – these shouldn’t be expanded past the two years steered by Possibility C.

Emissions ought to be examined in actual time

The Authorities also needs to implement real-world testing of auto emissions ( onboard gasoline consumption monitoring) to forestall producers from producing laboratory testing which is inaccurate, as they’ve carried out up to now.