[ad_1]
The ultimate deliverable from the WorldFAIR Mission with which I’m concerned has not too long ago been printed and may be freely downloaded from Zenodo by following the hyperlink beneath. The report is named “Agricultural biodiversity FAIR knowledge evaluation rubrics” and in it we current the outcomes from a sequence of six pilot research that adopted the FAIR* requirements and our suggestions from the earlier report.
This doc enhances the earlier one by giving examples and setting out pointers that permit researchers and practitioners to make sure FAIRness of their plant-pollinator interplay knowledge.
Right here’s the complete reference:
Drucker, D. P., Salim, J. A., Poelen, J., Soares, F. M., Gonzalez-Vaquero, R. A., Devoto, M., Ollerton, J., Kasina, M., Carvalheiro, L. G., Bergamo, P. J., Alves, D. A., Varassin, I., Tinoco, F. C., Rünzel, M., Robinson, D., Cardona-Duque, J., Idárraga, M., Agudelo-Zapata, M. C., Marentes Herrera, E., Taliga, C., Parr, C.S., Cox-Foster, D., Hill, E., Maués, M.M. Agostini, Ok. Rech, A.R., Saraiva, A. (2024). WorldFAIR (D10.3) Agricultural biodiversity FAIR knowledge evaluation rubrics (Model 1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10719265
Though that is the final formal deliverable from our WorldFAIR work bundle, it’s not the ultimate output that we now have deliberate. I’ll report again on the journal paper(s) that we’re writing as and when they’re printed.
*Findable, Accessible, Interoperable & Reusable (or generally Reproducible)
[ad_2]
Source link
